Last year, in EEOC v. Ford Motor Co., the 6th Circuit held that “telecommuting” AKA working from home, was a reasonable accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Our blog post discussing the initial decision can be found here- https://www.thefriedmannfirm.com/reasonable-accommodations-for-ada-disability/
This was fantastic news for most people, those with disabilities and those without. As our society becomes more technoligically advanced, the options available to us for non-traditional ways to work become more abundant. Employees are able to work from home, attend virtual conference calls and meetings, Skype or Facetime with clients and a variety of others. These things allow employers and employees to be more flexible with their work hours and can allow employees to work from home and work remotely if they are traveling. However, the number of people with disabilities in Ohio who are permitted to do this could be decreasing soon because of a recent decision by the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals.
On April 10, 2015, the 6th Circuit issued its rehearing decision on EEOC v. Ford Motor Co. (available here- http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/15a0066p-06.pdf) and rejected the EEOC’s claim that Ford Motor Co. violated the ADA by not allowing a disabled employee to telecommute as a reasonable accommodation under the ADA. Eight judges ruled in favor of Ford, while five dissented (disagreed) with the majority’s decision.
The plaintiff involved in this case is Jane Harris. Ms. Harris was employed by Ford as a resale buyer, whose job duties included acting as an intermediary between Ford’s steel suppliers and its parts manufacturers. She was responsible for meeting with suppliers, buying steel from them and selling it to parts manufacturers, who then manufactured parts and supplied them to Ford for its assembly lines. Ford claimed that face-to-face interaction with the manufacturers was an essential function of Harris’s job and it would not allow her to telecommute as a reasonable accommodation for her disability. Harris suffered from IBS (irritable bowel syndrome) which made it very difficult for her to be away from the bathroom for extended periods of time, as her symptoms were unpredictable. She requested to be able to work from home, as a reasonable accommodation under the ADA.
Ford told her it could not allow this because it would prevent her from performing one of the essential functions of her job, interacting with manufacturers. Ford offered her other accommodations that she rejected so she ultimately filed a Charge of Discrimination with the EEOC and the EEOC sued Ford on her behalf. The district court where her lawsuit was filed concluded that Ford did not have to offer telecommuting as a reasonable accommodation, as face-to-face interaction was an essential function of her job. The EEOC appealed this decision and a divided panel of 6th Circuit judges reversed, concluding an issue of fact existed as to whether telecommuting was a reasonable accommodation for Harris. The full 6th Circuit vacated that decision and reheard the appeal en banc. On April 10, 2015, summary judgment for Ford was affirmed.
This is bad news for most people becaue we value workplace flexibility. This doesn’t mean that all employees will be disallowed from telecommuting but rather, that an employer will take a good look at the employee’s job duties to decide whether those duties can still be performed while working from home. In Harris’s case, she tried telecommuting on several occasions and Ford argued those attempts were unsuccessful because she really couldn’t perform her job duties while working from home. In fact, Harris agreed that four of her ten primary job duties could not be accomplished while working from home. Ford presented evidence that other employees were permitted to telecommute but only did so one day per week and agreed to come to work if they were needed.
The important thing to take away from this decision is that telecommuting CAN still be a reasonable accommodation but it depends on the job duties of that particular employee. If you have questions about whether telecommuting could be a reasonable accommodation for you, please contact the Ohio Employment Lawyers at The Friedmann Firm and we will be happy to assist you.
Rachel and Dominick were incredibly helpful throughout the entire process. They got back to me quickly, whenever I had questions, which helped me stay calm during a very stressful time. Rachel was confident in her abilities and knowledge of the labor laws, and she was able to secure a settlement for me. If you ever find yourself in a situation that requires you take action against an employer, I would highly recommend the Friedman Firm. There's no one I would recommend more to be in your corner.
If you are in need of an employment attorney, this is your sign to talk to Rachel and Jamie. Amazing!! They handled my case like the true professionals they are! They stuck to a strategy, even when it seemed like it wasn’t going our way and BAM! We get the outcome we wanted. I couldn’t be happier and I will always return to them if I EVER have an employment issue again. Thank you so much for helping me and my family!
Dedicated! Thorough! Detailed! Professional! Personable! I can keep going with the many qualities Pete and his team have. I highly recommend him!!! You won't be disappointed.
I needed an employment lawyer to work through a non compete. Pete at The Friedmann Firm was listed as one of the three best rated employment lawyers on a local website. I called him in the morning and later that night he was on the case and provided sound council through a very tense negotiation. Don’t take a chance with your career, reach out and get good council. Pete was very responsive every step of the way and delivered positive results. I highly recommend Pete and his Firm!
Rachel was top-notch from start to finish. She was responsible, professional, quick to respond to emails, texts or phone calls. She gives it to you straight, which I prefer! She thinks outside the box and is definitely the dog you want in the fight for you. She does not waste time and immediately dives right in to get the best results she can for you. I would highly recommend Rachel and her firm to anyone who wants to get the job done right, the first time, in a professional, compassionate and decisive manner.
My wife used this firm for a matter she had with her former employer. She could not have been more satisfied with their services. They were timely in responses, courteous, and very thoughtful. This was a difficult process for her and Pete made it so much easier by handling all of the details of her case.
Rachel Sabo of The Friedmann Firm believed in me when no one else did & helped me through every step of my legal process. Very happy with the firm’s professionalism & dedication to my case.
I called them with some questions about my employment and Jamie was very helpful. I didn’t need an attorney to handle a case for me - only to help me navigate an issue I was having at work. She answered my questions and I felt she truly listened to me. I’d recommend this firm to anyone looking for an employment lawyer. Thank you!
Pete resolved issues I was having with my employer in a quick and favorable manner. He is also easy to talk to and understands his clients rights AND needs. You’d do right to call The Friedmann Firm.
I had a terrific experience with Rachel. She handled my case in a very professional manner. She made herself available and always kept me updated. Her knowledge of the law is incredible. She took the time to educate me on the legal processes so I understood what was happening with my case. Thank you Rachel for helping me navigate a most difficult situation. I am so thankful to have had you as my attorney. You have my highest recommendation.